tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213170457026677349.post4495693470155646762..comments2024-03-21T00:14:42.179-07:00Comments on Social Media and Banking: Expectation of Privacy and the Social Media PolicyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213170457026677349.post-36917670064728819972010-12-07T00:43:24.585-08:002010-12-07T00:43:24.585-08:00Jeffry,
Another one for you to ponder. What about...Jeffry,<br />Another one for you to ponder. What about the suit brought forward by the teachers' union in Manatee County, Florida on the basis of a violation of First Amendment rights?Jesse Torreshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01721379691508549253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213170457026677349.post-72142337913561033332010-12-07T00:07:38.385-08:002010-12-07T00:07:38.385-08:00Jeffry,
That certainly was the "intent."...Jeffry,<br />That certainly was the "intent." Which makes interesting the outcome in City of Ontario v. Quon, at the Court of Appeals level. This court decided in Quon's favor (right to privacy). It was ultimately decided at the highest court.<br /><br />And let's not even get into "at will" discussions. Here in California, which is a pro-employee state, "at will" clauses are often just inconvenience in baseless HR lawsuits. But that discussion is better left for a different day and a different discussion board.Jesse Torreshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01721379691508549253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213170457026677349.post-53847112299120153992010-12-06T08:52:48.806-08:002010-12-06T08:52:48.806-08:00The Fourth Amendment is intended to protect citize...The Fourth Amendment is intended to protect citizens from their government, not employees from their employers where an "at-will" relationship applies.Jeffry Pilcherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10851960219269534085noreply@blogger.com